STG390 Problem Ransomware Assignment

STG390 Problem Ransomware Assignment
Refer to the “Contemporary Issues in Science and Technology Research Guide,” located in the Course Materials, for complete instructions……………(PROBLEM: RANSOMWARE).
Section 3: Possible Feasible Solutions
Now that you have clearly defined the problem and gathered data that validates it, it is time to propose the solution.
In a Microsoft Word document that is 500–750 words, include the following:
Outline the possible/feasible solutions.
Provide a justification for the chosen solution and
Describe the process that was used to choose the solution. This should include what ethical, social, and economic considerations were made in choosing your solution. Specifically explain how a moral and ethical decision was made. Provide Biblical citations to support the decision and explain the relevance.
Explain what guidance the professional organizations in your field offered. How did this impact the solution choice?
NOTE- MAKE EACH QUESTION A HEADING AND MAKE USE OF THE ATTACHMENT TO DO THE ASSIGNMENT.
Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code
Class Code
Assignment Title
Total Points

STG-390
STG-390-O500
Benchmark – Contemporary Issues in Science and Technology Section 3: Possible Feasible Solutions
85.0

Criteria
Percentage
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Good (85.00%)
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Points Earned

Group 1
90.0%

Possible Feasible Solution
25.0%
The student does not provide a possible feasible solution.
The student provides a possible solution, but the information provided is overly generalized and may contain errors or missing components. The solution may not be feasible.
The student provides a possible feasible solution, but it is not fully described or not fully feasible.
The student provides a clear possible solution and the feasibility is evident.
The student provides a clear possible feasible solution, and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Justification for the Chosen Solution (C3.3)
25.0%
The student does not provide justification for the chosen solution.
The student provides a justification, but it is overly generalized and it may contain errors or missing components.
The student provides a justification, but it provides a surface-level analysis and explanation.
The student clearly provides a justification. The justification is direct, competent, and appropriate.
The student thoughtfully provides a justification, and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Explanation of the Decision-Making Process for Choosing the Solution. (Includes ethical, social, and economic considerations, and explains what steps were implemented to ensure that the decision was moral and ethical including Biblical citations with explanations of the application.)
20.0%
The student does not address the decision-making process.
The student provides an explanation of the decision-making process, but the information provided is overly generalized and may contain errors or missing components.
The student provides an explanation of the decision-making process, but the information is a surface-level explanation.
The student clearly provides an explanation of the decision-making process. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate.
The student thoughtfully provides an explanation of the decision-making process, and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Professional Organization Guidance
20.0%
The student does not address the guidance provided by the professional organization(s).
The student provides an explanation of the guidance provided by the professional organization(s), but the information provided is overly generalized and may contain errors or missing components.
The student provides an explanation of the guidance provided by the professional organization(s), but the information is a surface-level explanation.
The student clearly provides an explanation of the guidance provided by the professional organization(s). Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate.
The student thoughtfully provides an explanation of the guidance provided by the professional organization(s), and does so in a comprehensive and insightful way.

Group 2
5.0%

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Group 3
5.0%

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
3.0%
Appropriate template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
2.0%
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Weightage
100%

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code DALE